Richard Cohen needs a vacation
Wednesday, July 29th, 2009I agree with David Sirota that the latest column by Richard Cohen at the Washington Post is proof he’s gone batshit insane. It’s a hodgepodge of three ideas: Obama is lousy at passing Health Care, Obama is a boring interview subject and because Cohen hasn’t interviewed the President, he should win a Pulitzer Prize.
Or at least will win won. He starts off the piece implying he’s already won the prize for not interviewing the President. And he writes that Obama on TV is less interesting than a Maury Povich rerun.
The idea that a “journalist” would find reruns of Maury Povich more interesting than a brand new interview with the President is confusing enough.
Cohen writes that President’s used to be “awesome” and to interview one was enough to win the Pulitzer Prize and implies that at such a time he would have jumped at the chance to interview the President. Well, I checked the Pulitzer archives and found two instances of winners for exclusive interviews with Presidents: Arthur Krock of the New York Times for his interview of President Roosevelt and Louis Seibold of the New York World for his interview of President Wilson.
Krock won the prize in 1938 and Seibold in 1921. Cohen joined the Washington Post in 1968. If he can remember reporting back that far, he is way too old.
Cohen also thinks its better if Obama is kept off the TV, which TV executives, magazine editors and various others would passionately disagree with, since Obama helps circulation when he appears on the cover.
Richard, I think its time you take a break and let a journalist take over your column. At least until you summon the energy to learn about the issues of the day instead of watching Mauray Povich reruns.








